skip to main content

tantra and polyamory · part 4 of 9

the tantric map - osiris

antonio · July 6, 2026 · 4 min read

i am a fixer.

when someone i love is in pain, my instinct is to move toward the problem. to find the thing causing it and remove it. to offer a solution, a reframe, a path out. it feels like care. and some of it is. but i've had to sit with an uncomfortable truth: a lot of what i call fixing is really about my own discomfort with someone else's pain. i want it resolved because watching someone i love suffer is hard to hold.

that's not compassion. that's management.


i came to this pairing the same way i came to thoth · through mythology first, and then through recognition.

in tantric buddhism, Avalokiteshvara is the bodhisattva of compassion · a being who has reached the threshold of enlightenment and chooses not to cross it alone, delaying their own liberation to remain present for all who suffer. he is sometimes depicted with a thousand arms, each one reaching toward a different kind of suffering. he doesn't turn away from pain. he moves toward it. and crucially, he doesn't arrive to fix it. he arrives to stay.

in the kemetic tradition, osiris is the god who was killed, dismembered, and reconstituted through the devotion of those who loved him. he presides over the weighing of the heart not as a punisher but as a witness. what i understand about osiris is that his compassion isn't theoretical. he knows what it is to be broken. he has been inside suffering. and that's what makes him capable of holding others inside theirs.

what i recognized across those two traditions was the same quality. compassion not as a feeling you have for someone, but as a capacity to remain present with their pain without needing it to be different than it is.


i have had heartache in relationships. real loss. the kind that takes something from you that takes a while to fully come back.

for a long time i carried that as something to move past. to heal from and leave behind. but sitting with these traditions, i've started to understand it differently. my own experience of being broken open is not separate from my capacity for compassion. it is the source of it. the moments i have been undone are the moments i can draw from when someone i love is being undone. i know that place. i've been inside it. and that knowing, if i let it, is what allows me to sit with someone else there without flinching, without fixing, without needing them to be okay before i am comfortable.

osiris didn't transcend his suffering. he was reconstituted through it. that's the distinction that matters to me.


there is a Prince song i keep returning to. "if i was your girlfriend." in it he sings: wouldn't you run to me if somebody hurt you / even if that somebody was me.

that lyric has stayed with me because it names the hardest version of this practice. it isn't just about being present with a partner's pain in the abstract. it's about being present with pain that you caused. being the person they can still run to, even when you're the reason they're hurting. that requires something most of us haven't fully developed. it requires the other person to trust you enough to be that vulnerable. and it requires you to receive that vulnerability without collapsing into guilt, without defending yourself, without making their pain about you.

that's the space i want to be able to hold. emotional safety that doesn't depend on me being blameless.


the practice, as i understand it and as i fumble toward it, is about learning to put the fix-it instinct down long enough to just be present. to ask not what can i do but what does this person need me to be right now. sometimes the answer is witness. sometimes it's proximity. sometimes it's silence that doesn't feel like absence.

Avalokiteshvara's thousand arms aren't reaching to solve. they're reaching to say: i am still here. whatever this is, i am not leaving.

that's what i'm practicing.

something to sit with

where in your relationships are you fixing when someone is asking you to stay?